PWS is a complex neurodevelopmental disorder caused by the lack of expression of specific paternally inherited genes on chromosome 15q11-q13. In contrast, AS results from the loss of maternally inherited gene expression in this same region, highlighting the distinct parental origin impacts on gene expression. Several genes within the PWS region are vital to the syndrome's characteristics, including MKRN3, MAGEL2, NDN, PWRN1, NPAP1, and the small nucleolar RNA cluster (SNURF-SNRPN). The unique imprinting and methylation patterns in these genes, especially at CpG islands in their promoter regions, play an integral role in the differential expression on maternal versus paternal alleles.
PWS has an equal prevalence in males and females, with occurrence rates between 1 in 10,000 and 1 in 25,000 live births. Its hallmark features, particularly during childhood, arise primarily from hypothalamic dysfunction, manifesting in various stages of nutritional phases, as defined by Miller et al. Phase progression starts from growth restriction in utero (Phase 0), with symptoms evolving through phases marked by hypotonia, early feeding difficulties, weight gain, and ultimately, pronounced hyperphagia and insatiable appetite from childhood onward (Phase 3). Behavioral challenges, cognitive impairments, characteristic facial features, and musculoskeletal issues like spinal deformities further define the syndrome's phenotype.
Clinical and Cytogenetic Diagnosis of Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS)
1. Clinical Diagnostic Criteria
The clinical diagnosis of PWS has evolved significantly since the establishment of consensus criteria in 1993, which were designed before the availability of genetic testing. These original clinical criteria were used to identify patients based on physical, behavioral, and developmental characteristics associated with PWS. However, with the advent of precise genetic diagnostics, the clinical criteria now primarily serve to raise suspicion of PWS, prompting further genetic testing. Recognizing this shift, Meral et al. introduced a revised clinical criterion with a lower threshold, aimed at identifying potential PWS cases. Despite these advances, genetic testing remains essential for definitive diagnosis, as clinical features alone can be insufficient due to overlapping symptoms with other genetic conditions.
2. Cytogenetic Diagnostic Methods
Cytogenetic methods provide structural and functional insight into chromosomal abnormalities. Although less commonly used today due to the availability of more advanced genetic testing, cytogenetic approaches still play a role in PWS diagnostics, particularly in cases where detailed chromosomal assessment is required.
2.1 High-Resolution Cytogenetics: Before the availability of molecular diagnostics, high-resolution cytogenetics was the primary laboratory method for detecting PWS. This technique was able to detect deletions in the 15q11.2–13 region in about 60% of PWS patients, alongside other chromosomal abnormalities in around 3–5% of cases. However, this approach has limitations: about one-third of PWS patients present with normal karyotypes due to submicroscopic deletions or uniparental disomy (mUPD), which cannot be detected through high-resolution cytogenetics. Therefore, high-resolution cytogenetics has largely been replaced by more sensitive and specific molecular methods.
2.2 Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization (FISH): Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) is a more targeted cytogenetic technique, frequently used to detect the absence of the PWS region on chromosome 15. This method relies on the hybridization of a fluorescently-labeled DNA probe specific to the PWS region to the patient's DNA. Under fluorescence microscopy, a single fluorescence signal indicates a deletion on one of the chromosome 15 alleles, whereas two signals are observed in unaffected individuals. FISH can also distinguish between Type I and Type II deletions when paired with specific probes. Despite its precision in deletion detection, FISH has limitations, including an inability to detect UPD or to differentiate between PWS and Angelman syndrome (AS) deletions. Additionally, FISH is not a high-throughput method, which limits its efficiency for large-scale screening.
2.3 Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA): Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is a highly sensitive method that identifies both microdeletions and microduplications within the genome. CMA encompasses two primary techniques:
- Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH): This method compares the patient's DNA to a reference sample, allowing for the detection of copy number variations. In aCGH, patient and control DNA fragments are labeled with different fluorescent colors (e.g., green and red) and hybridized on an array. Fluorescence intensity is digitally measured to identify deletions or duplications based on fluorescence ratios.
- Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) Array: SNP arrays label and hybridize the patient's sample to probes selected from known genomic locations, which allows for the identification of copy number changes and single nucleotide polymorphisms. Additionally, SNP arrays can detect long contiguous stretches of homozygosity (LCSH), making them proficient at identifying cases of uniparental disomy (UPD).
CMA offers significant advantages in detecting PWS deletion size and other chromosomal anomalies, making it a preferred method in many clinical settings. However, like FISH, CMA cannot identify balanced chromosomal rearrangements, such as balanced translocations or inversions, which may require complementary testing for complete chromosomal analysis.
Conclusion
Early diagnosis and intervention for PWS can substantially improve patient quality of life by reducing obesity, cognitive, and metabolic complications. The combination of prenatal and newborn screening is crucial in lowering the diagnostic age, which may enable timely treatment and management strategies [Citation85, Citation86]. In addition, the recent discovery of sno-lncRNAs presents a stable biomarker for PWS diagnosis, with potential applications in newborn screening due to their resilience against degradation. Future research combining sno-lncRNA biomarkers with neonatal screening technologies holds promise for advancing early and accurate PWS detection.