Self-Assessment Report (SAR) Process​​​

Introduction

The Self-Assessment Report (SAR) is the first step of a programme review. It is the critical self-analysis of a programme or entity based on documented evidence and completed by the programme or entity itself prior to the external peer review. Prior to this, a curriculum review exercise is usually conducted, a report of which will be included in the SAR.

What is it?​

The SAR is an approximately 40-page (plus appendices) holistic report that covers all aspects of the programme and allows the deliverers and organizers of the programme to self-appraise its accomplishments and progress.

There are guidelines that provide for ‘What constitutes a ‘complete self-assessment report’ as required by the university’s Academic Quality Framework. Before the SAR report is forwarded to the Peer Reviewers, the Quality Assurance Review Committee (QARC) members independently review for its completeness, which requires the following elements: 

  1. The SAR addresses all 18 cells (see IUCEA Road Map, Volume 1: p. 36), and provides a substantial array of evidence to support the findings of the Report. 

  2. The SAR clearly defines the strengths and weaknesses of the programme, as the Self-Assessment Committee sees them, and also areas of good practice. 

  3. The contents of the proposed Improvement Plan (or Action Plan) are closely aligned with the identified weaknesses of the programme, and the proposed actions are SMART (i.e. specific, measurable, achievable, realistic and time-bound). 

How does it work?

QAI conducts self-assessment training for SAR participants appointed by the Dean. The individuals who undergo the SAR training then carry out the SAR exercise for programme(s) in their entity. The completed SAR is independently reviewed by QARC for its ‘completeness’ and signed-off for the next level, which is the peer/external review process.​

Benefits: 

Why is self-evaluation important?

  • The workers within an educational organization should always aim to produce, improve and enhance its quality, rather than passively accepting that everything is fine.

  • The self-assessment will provide information that was not previously known to all parties and enhance the transparency and accountability of a programme/entity.

  • The self-assessment involves all members of an organization, including students, in the discussion on the quality of education, and takes their input into account.

  • A self-assessment serves as a preparation for a site visit by external experts, providing them with basic information.​

Participation:

The SAR team is composed of 4-6 faculty members, at least 1 academic staff member and at least 1 student. These individuals are nominated by the Dean and selected by the Provost. The Dean will nominate a faculty member from the group to serve as Chair and to be responsible for the production of the SAR. Normally, the Programme Director/Head of progr​ammes chairs the SAR group. A secretary from within the entity will be assigned to work with the group. 

Duration:

An effective self-assessment is time-consuming. It requires effort b​y staff and students. The approximate duration of a programme SAR is 4-6 months, and a cluster-programme or full entity SAR is 6-8 months. 

The following table shows all AKU entities/programmes that have gone through self-assessment training and have completed or are undergoing the SAR exercise:​

Name of Entity​​Programme Names    SAR Status
School of Nursing and Midwifery, TanzaniaBachelor of Science (Post-RN BScN) Complete
School of Nursing and Midwifery, KenyaBachelor of Science (Post-RN BScN) Complete
School of Nursing and Midwifery, UgandaBachelor of Science (Post-RN BScN) Complete

​​School of Nursing and Midwifery, Pakistan

​ ​​

Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BScN)
Co​mplete
Bachelor of Science (Post-RN BScN) Complete
Bachelor of Science in Midwifery Complete (Post-RM BScM)
​Complete
Master of Science in NursingComplete

 

Medical College, East Africa

Post Graduate Medical Education- specialty in Obstetrics and Gynecology, AKU Health SciencesComplete
Post Graduate Medical Education-specialty in Pediatrics and Child HealthComplete

​​​Medical College, Pakistan

​ ​
Master of Health Professions Education (MHPE)Com​​plete

Master of Science (Health Policy & Management)

Complete

Master of Science (Epidemiology & Biostatistics)

Complete
Associate of Science in Dental Hygiene (ASDH)Ongoing
Institute for Educational Development, East AfricaMaster of Education
Complete
Institute for Educational Development, Pakistan​
Master of EducationComplete
Master of PhilosophyComplete

​ 

PGME Pakistan


General SurgeryOngo​ing
Internal Medicine
Ongoing
Orthopedics​​
Ong​oing​​


Support:

QAI is available to aid the programmes throughout the SAR process through a three-tier support system.

1st tier: Training Sessions

  • QAI will conduct SAR training for members of the SAR committee 

  • If requested, QAI can provide an additional cell-by-cell training session(s)

  • QAI will guide the members through the process, address any challenges and answer all questions, and provide examples of other entities that have faced similar challenges

  • QAI will refer the SAR team to available self-assessment forums/resources both internal and external to the university

2nd tier: Email and Phone Correspondence

  • Any questions or concerns from the SAR team can be addressed to QAI via email or telephone and will be responded to as soon as possible

  • QAI will send periodic reminders to the SAR Chair requesting updates on the process and/or inquiring if they require additional aid

  • Contact faisal.notta@aku.edu for any questions

3rd tier: Additional One-on-one Meetings

  • Individual or group consultation with SAR members and QAI members

  • Zoom, Skype or face-to-face

Testimonials:

“I personally started to analyze m​y own teaching/learning practices.” 

(SONAM Pakistan, 2015)


“Initially we felt threatened and defensive towards having to participate in the cyclical review process. However, as we went through the self-assessment process, the act of identifying our own issues means we are more likely to make the needed changes for improvement. It was a very usefu​l process!” 

(Department Chair Medical College Pakistan Graduate Programmes, 2016)


“[I] have more clarity on ​​how to identify evidences and to develop an improvement plan.” 

(IED PK SAR Training, 2018)



QAI Associate Director Faisal Notta conducting SAR training for SONAM Pakistan (2015)

                                              

  QTL Director Tashmin Khamis conducting SAR training for IED PK (2018)


​Resources:

For the full guidance sheet, the SAR checklist of “completeness” and other helpful links, check out our Tools for Programme Review​ at AKU in the Resources section.​